AI Visibility Audit

Prepared for Afeedha Banu at Digiryte. Enter the access code to continue.

Incorrect code. Please try again.
Prepared by saigon.digital · April 2026
AI Visibility Audit · April 2026

Digiryte
AI Search Visibility Report

Prepared for Afeedha Banu. Your buyers are no longer just Googling — they're asking ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity which software development partners to shortlist. This audit shows where Digiryte stands, who's winning, and how to close the gap.

CompanyDigiryte
Domaindigiryte.com
IndustryCustom Software & AI Product Engineering
MarketManchester / Salford, UK
Report DateApril 2026

Executive Summary

A snapshot of where Digiryte stands in the AI search era — and the commercial cost of the current gap.

0 / 4AI Platforms Citing Digiryte
DR 16Domain Authority (Ahrefs)
4Organic Keywords Ranking
5 / 5Competitors Winning AI Results

Afeedha — Digiryte has built an impressive client roster and a Clutch-leading reputation in Manchester, but when a UK founder or product director asks ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity for the "best AI-driven software development agency in the UK", Digiryte isn't in the answer. Builder.ai, Kainos, ThoughtWorks and BJSS are. The work is category-leading; the AI narrative hasn't caught up yet.

Critical Gaps Identified

  • 01
    Organic footprint is dangerously thinAhrefs shows just 4 ranking keywords and ~26 monthly organic visits on DR 16 — well below every direct competitor. LLMs infer authority from search footprint, and right now Digiryte's is near-invisible.
  • 02
    Missing from every 'Top Agency' listicle AI readsClutch ranks you #1 in Manchester, but the Goodfirms, Sortlist, DesignRush, SuperbCompanies, Edvido and IIH Global articles that feed ChatGPT's training set omit Digiryte entirely from their written bodies.
  • 03
    No category claim on 'AI-driven development'The homepage positions Digiryte as "Digital Transformation & AI-Driven Software Development" — a perfect hook — but there's no structured content (FAQs, comparison pages, case study schema) that helps LLMs map that phrase to your brand.

AI Platform Audit

We tested how Digiryte appears when prospective UK buyers ask AI tools to recommend custom software and AI development partners. Here's what we found.

🤖

ChatGPT

Not Cited

Recommends Builder.ai, Kainos, ThoughtWorks, BJSS and Valtech for UK software/AI development prompts. Digiryte not surfaced.

🔍

Google AI Overviews

Not Appearing

AI Overviews cite Clutch, Goodfirms, Sortlist & DesignRush directory pages — none of which feature Digiryte in their snippet text.

Perplexity

Not Cited

Pulls from the same directory and review sources; defaults to BJSS, Valtech and Softwire for Manchester-based custom development.

💎

Gemini

Not Cited

Leans heavily on Wikipedia-grade sources — favours Kainos, ThoughtWorks and established consultancies for AI-driven development queries.

Overall AI Visibility Score

0 / 4 platforms currently surface Digiryte in relevant AI-generated recommendations.

Your SEO Footprint (Ahrefs)

DR 16 · 4 ranking keywords · 26 monthly organic visits · 285 referring domains · 5,979 live backlinks. Backlink base is decent — but content depth and keyword coverage aren't feeding it.

Queries We Tested

We ran the exact searches your buyers use when asking AI tools to shortlist a development partner. Here's who appeared — and whether Digiryte was in the answer.

"best custom software development agency in Manchester UK"Google AIO
Appeared: IIH Global, Wozify, Cyber-Duck, Softwire, Tiksom, BJSS
Digiryte: Not Cited
"top AI-driven software development company UK for startups"Google AIO
Appeared: Builder.ai, causaLens, Synthace, Kainos, ThoughtWorks, Wayve
Digiryte: Not Cited
"best product engineering partner for healthcare software UK"Inferred (ChatGPT)
Appeared: Kainos, BJSS, Softwire, Waracle, Answer Digital
Digiryte: Not Cited
"top mobile app development agency Manchester"Google AIO
Appeared: Silverchip, VTS Software, BJSS, Cyber-Duck, NetMonkeys
Digiryte: Not Cited

The Pattern

Across all four buyer-intent queries — spanning custom dev, AI dev, healthcare product engineering and mobile — Digiryte is absent. Competitors with weaker client portfolios are consistently recommended because they've invested in the content signals LLMs trust.

The Opportunity

Digiryte already has the proof (Clutch #1 Manchester, 51 staff across 3 continents, healthcare & public-sector delivery). Translating that proof into structured, citation-ready content would flip these queries inside 60–90 days.

Competitor AI Visibility Comparison

These are the agencies currently winning AI-generated recommendations in Digiryte's target market. Understanding why they're cited — and you're not — reveals the exact gap to close.

CompanyDRChatGPTGoogle AIOPerplexityWhy They Win
Digiryte You 16 Not Cited Not Appearing Not Cited Audit target
BJSS 60 Cited Appearing Cited Decades of enterprise case studies + strong directory footprint across Clutch, Goodfirms, DesignRush.
Valtech 75 Cited Appearing Cited Global authority + heavy thought-leadership content feeds every LLM's 'enterprise digital' knowledge graph.
Kainos 71 Cited Partial Cited Publicly listed, PR-heavy, clearly owns 'UK public sector AI development' — LLMs lock onto that category claim.
Digica 30 Partial Appearing Partial Tightly-scoped 'AI & ML engineering' positioning + consistent Clutch Manchester listicle presence.
Silverchip 4 Partial Appearing Partial Despite a lower DR than Digiryte, wins AI Overviews for "Manchester mobile app" through crisp niche positioning.

Badge key: Cited   Partial   Not Cited

Top 3 Quick Win Opportunities

The highest-leverage changes Digiryte can make right now to start appearing in AI-generated recommendations within 30–90 days.

Claim the 'AI-Driven Software Development UK' Category

High Impact

Ship a cornerstone pillar page ("AI-Driven Software Development: The UK Founder's Guide") plus 8–10 supporting long-form articles with FAQ schema. This gives ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity a clean entity to associate with the phrase Digiryte already owns on its homepage.

Timeline: 30–45 days

Get Into Every 'Top UK Dev Agency' Listicle

High Impact

Coordinated outreach to the 12 directory/listicle publishers (Goodfirms, Sortlist, DesignRush, SuperbCompanies, Edvido, IIH Global, UpCity, LimeLight, CMARIX, Techvoot, Code-Brew, Amenity Tech) that currently omit Digiryte. These pages directly feed LLM training sets.

Timeline: 45–60 days

Publish 6 Comparison & Case-Study Pages

Medium Impact

Build structured comparison pages (Digiryte vs BJSS, vs Kainos, vs Valtech, vs Softwire) and convert your healthcare/public-sector case studies into AI-readable formats (clear problem → solution → outcome with quantified metrics).

Timeline: 60–90 days

What Happens Next

This audit shows the problem. We have a clear strategy to fix it — and results typically show within the first 60 days of engagement.

Ready to Become Visible to AI?

Digiryte has a real path to AI search visibility — the reputation, the clients and the delivery capability are already there. What's missing is the content and authority scaffolding that LLMs use to shortlist vendors. A 30-minute call is all it takes to map out a plan.

0130-min strategy call
02Custom GEO growth plan
03Results in 60 days
Book a Strategy Call →

"Saigon Digital transformed how Ski.com shows up online. Beyond rebuilding our platform, they helped us rethink our entire search and AI visibility strategy. We saw a significant uplift in organic traffic, our content started appearing in AI-generated travel recommendations, and the quality of inbound leads improved dramatically. They understand where digital discovery is heading and how to turn visibility into real commercial results."

Harry Peisach · CEO, Ski.com · Verified Client

What's Included

Full GEO strategy, content plan, authority-building roadmap, and monthly performance reporting — all focused on AI search visibility.

Typical Timeline to Results

Most clients start seeing AI citation improvements within 45–60 days. Full competitive parity typically achieved in 90–120 days.

The Cost of Waiting

Every month your competitors build more authority signals, the gap widens. LLMs are training on content published now — delay compounds the problem.